One year later…

It’s been a year now since I took office, and I’d like to get some feedback about how the community thinks things have been going.  Was there anything you were particularly pleased with or upset by?  Do you have any suggestions, comments, or concerns as we move forward?  You can leave a comment here, or email me at bbv4kcc@gmail.com.

This year I plan to start a series of meetings I’m tentatively calling “Coffee with the Councilwoman.”  I envision these being informal meet-and-greets where folks can chat with me about whatever is important to them.  I’d like to run these much like my pre-election “Meet the Candidate” sessions, so I’ll be querying Kuna businesses to see which might be willing to host.  Look for more information on these meetings in upcoming blog posts.

A big ‘thank you’ to everyone who has participated in Kuna government, community, events, and business in 2012.  Let’s keep working together in 2013 to make Kuna great!

City of Kuna FY13 Budget

There will be a public hearing at the next Council meeting – September 4 at 7p.m. – regarding the proposed City of Kuna budget for fiscal year 2013.  This budgeting process was a trying experience; Kuna is in a difficult position because we lack a large commercial base to help cover the cost of running our City.  While most cities have at least close to an even ratio of business versus residential tax income, Kuna’s statistics are more along the lines of 20% commerical and 80% residential tax base.  Increasing commercial activity and attracting new businesses needs to be a priority moving forward, as it will not only enhance our City but is also the only real way to generate enough tax revenue to do anything above simply breaking even each year.

There are a few budget items worth explanation, though I am happy to answer questions about any individual line item — please comment below or email me at bbv4kcc@gmail.com

First of all, I took seriously the promises I made while campaigning.  I want to ensure Kuna government is accountable to the residents and is acting in their best interests.  Along those lines, I took pains to examine the budget in great detail and scrutinize many items.  I was able to identify nearly $7,000 in savings by cutting out some unnecessary expenditures, requiring the City to be a little leaner in some areas, and making sure citizens are not paying for things more appropriately paid for by City employees.  This may not seem like a lot of money, but in fact these were virtually the only cuts made from the budget.

The biggest change in the budget was an increase to the contract with Ada County Sheriff’s Office, who provide our police services.  Their budget went up about 13% primarily due to pay and benefits increases approved by the Ada County Commissioners, but it also included a change in service vehicles from the Ford Crown Victoria (which is no longer being manufactured) to the Chevy Tahoe.  The pay and benefits increase was a much-needed longevity incentive — last year, ACSO lost six officers to the Boise Police Department, who offer a more lucrative compensation package.  Four of those officers worked in Kuna, resulting in the equivalent of nearly $500,000 of training walking out the door (not to mention their combined law enforcement experience of nearly 50 years!).  The increase approved by Commissioners rewards employees for staying with ACSO with pay increases at the five, 10, and 15-year marks.  The cost for our contract with ACSO is a pretty fixed item because it’s not a for-profit arrangement — we get billed the actual cost of policing services.  Therefore, if we want the price to be lower, we have to decide what particular service we want to eliminate.  We’re still at lowered staffing levels from severe cuts that occurred a few years ago, and any signficant cut would result in either the part-time clerk position being eliminated (meaning no public access to the Police Station) or losing one of ony two detectives stationed in Kuna.  These would be significant losses and I didn’t think reducing already-tight police services would benefit Kuna residents — not to mention the fact that we need to have safe, pleasant community if we want to attract more businesses.  Chief Aldrich scoured his budget and was able to find a little savings — he’ll be taking a patrol car out of the standard rotation, saving the City about $30,000.  His efforts in finding this savings were greatly appreciated, and an example of the successful partnership we’ve fostered.

Another big change was the Mayor’s request to increase City employee salaries.  If the budget is approved, City employees will see a 2.5% pay increase, with another 2.5% set aside in a merit/incentive pool to reward exemplary work. 

A few other items of note:

  • A new full-time position was created in the Parks Department; this will replace a current part-time position, and should save money for the City overall.  
  • We budgeted money to overhaul the City’s website, which is currently pretty outdated and not very user-friendly.  We hope to make it much more navigable and beneficial for residents.
  • Money was budgeted to undertake a pilot project for the installation of a new type of streetlight – this will replace 10 current streetlights with the newer version, and allow us to see how cost- and energy-efficient they are.  It is expected that if we can replace all the streetlights in Kuna, we’ll save nearly $85,000 each year!

In order to fund these and other items, and to conclude with a balanced budget, it was necessary for Council to levy a tax increase.  Thankfully, the increase to the average family (with a home valued at approximately $106,000) is relatively small — about $20, or only $10 if the Homeowner’s Exemption is taken.

Kuna City Police

(photo courtesy Ada County Sheriff’s Office)
Kuna City Police Chief Kody Aldrich

This past Saturday I had the pleasure of accompanying Kuna Police Chief Kody Aldrich on a ride-along during Kuna Days.  I wasn’t sure what to expect, but as I started to drive home eight hours later (at 4am), I was supremely impressed with the experience (and I already want to do it again!).  The variety of issues we dealt with was surprisingly broad – from youth interventions to bar fights, domestic issues to DUIs, parole violations to public urination – these officers deal with so much each day, and do it with the highest level of professionalism. 

I came away with several overall impressions:

(1)    The willingness to spend time on the seemingly small things – like making sure underage girls caught smoking in the park are dealt with in a way that will correct their behavior moving forward – makes a big difference in enhancing our community and helping to prevent future issues.  While it might be easier to just issue a citation, taking the time to have conversations, involve parents, and consider each person individually is what makes a lasting difference.

(2)    Our officers are remarkably level-headed and show incredible restraint.  When drunken, belligerent individuals postured aggressively, officers were able to de-escalate situations by reacting in a measured way rather than matching that aggression and possibly making the situation worse.  With so many bar fights, I was sure I’d see a taser drawn before the night was over – but our officers were able to control situations with appropriate verbal responses instead.    

(3)    I am really impressed with the amount of community policing that occurs.  It is clear our officers have a good reputation within the community, as evidenced by the near-constant warm ‘hello’s Chief Aldrich received everywhere we went.  When that many members of the community know our Chief by name – and he knows them by name, too – it is a great sign that our police are doing their job well. 

A big “thank you” to our officers, who do a great job every day keeping our community safe!

Grange Honorees

April is Grange Month, and each year the Kuna Grange honors a Firefighter, Police Officer, Teacher, Grange Member, and Community Citizen.  We have a great group of honorees this year.

We broke with tradition and honored two Community Citizens of the Year: (1) Mayor Greg Nelson, for his efforts in repairing damaged relationships with community partners such as ACHD, Idaho Power, and sister cities, and (2) Calvin Nebeker for his heroic actions on February 2, 2012, when he disarmed a woman with a gun, putting himself in harm’s way to help save a co-worker and other community members.

Our Teacher of the Year is Jennifer Wright; the Police Officer of the Year is Gary Miller; the Fireman of the Year is T.J. Lawrence; and the Granger of the Year is Florence Gibson Chaney.  All of these honorees were nominated by the peers, which is an additional testament to their good work and dedication.

The Grange thanks all our honorees for their service and dedication to the community!

2012 Kuna Easter Egg Hunt

(c) TheFunTimesGuide.com

At the last Council meeting, Kuna resident Sheri Russell asked Council if the City would consider making a donation to the annual Easter Egg hunt, which Sheri has organized for the last 20 years.  Initially the event drew about 150 children, but today it has grown to approximately 1,000 kids aged 10 and younger.  Sheri gets volunteers together to fill around 10,000 plastic eggs with candy and prizes, and the eggs are hidden around the High School football and soccer fields for kids to find.  There are also prizes provided for each age group, including one lucky child from each age group receiving a bike!

At the time of the Council meeting, Sheri had only received $300 in pledged dpnations.  She estimated the event would cost at least $1900.  The City has donated to this event in the past, but when the budget got tight the City stopped all charitable contributions.

I am generally not in favor of using City funds for specific projects unless the funds go to events that are open to the entire community.  Earlier this year, Council voted to waive fees for use of the City park for a few nights during the summer so a Vacation Bible School could operate — the VBS was not just about sending kids to a church program; they also offered dinner to anyone who showed up and folks didn’t have to pay to be included.  This Easter Egg hunt is the same — it’s a service provided to the entire community by volunteers who are not profiting from this in any way.  It’s open to every child in Kuna and is a nice recreational activity for families to go be a part of.  Because the event is locally organized by one very dedicated woman, it’s not set up to be a charity and therefore donations are not tax-exempt, making it more difficult to get donations generally and especially in this economy.  For these reasons, I voted in favor of the City donating $1,000 towards this year’s Easter Egg Hunt.

I hope folks go out and enjoy this great community event.  This year it’s on Saturday, April 7th and starts at 10AM sharp — don’t be late or the eggs will all be found!  If you are interested in donating to the event, you can mail your donation to Sheri Russell, P.O. Box 250, Kuna ID 83634, or stop by Myers Real Estate Office at 452 Main Street.  There will also be an egg stuffing party at 6:30PM on April 2nd at the Community Hall, and everyone is welcome.

Kuna Boys & Girls Club

Last night Council was asked to consider adopting three items: (1) a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, which would change the proposed Boys & Girls Club (BGC) property from high-density residential to commercial business district zoning to be compatible with the commercial usages contemplated for the BGC site; (2) a rezone of the property from residential to commercial (if #1 were approved, this would need to be approved as well to be consistent) and adoption of a Development Agreement that sets forth the requirements of improvements to the property moving forward; and (3) a Lot Line Adjustment to allow a small 800 sq ft parcel of land already owned by BGC to be joined with several acres of property donated by Mellin Properties Ltd., to create the final BGC site.

We heard public testimony from many interested parties; 23 people signed up to speak in favor of these changes, one person (Mr. Mellin) signed up as a “neutral” speaker to give background and context, and five people signed up to speak in opposition to the changes.  First of all, even though four people spoke in opposition (one who signed up left prior to testifying), they only represented two properties in the subdivision which will be adjacent to the BGC.  Their concerns related to the potential for increased traffic on their street, and I certainly understood their concerns and appreciated the changes they might experience as a result of these changes.  However, two traffic impact studies were conducted and concluded that the increased use of the road would be minimal, that the road was equipped to handle the traffic, and that there was no need to construct a secondary access road.  Even ACHD arrived at and signed off on these conclusions.

The long and short of it, for me, is that Kuna desperately needs affordable recreation for our youth.  This site is perfect because it is located within one mile of SEVEN schools, allowing easy access for many Kuna youth.  The site will allow for a lot of pedestrian and bike traffic and with the planned layout, the site will be very safe.  Additionally, as can be seen in the above rendition of the future development of the Mellin Property, there will be significant commercial development in the future which will create additional access points for BGC and will reduce or eliminate any strain being experienced by the adjoining neighborhood.

I congratulate the Boys & Girls Club advocates on all their hard work – hundreds of hours of time were spent preparing the plans, engaging in discussions with the City and other organizations, and rallying support.  Now we move forward with fundraising so the Club can be constructed, and I look forward to assisting in any way possible.  This is truly a victory for Kuna!

Creekside EDU Assessment

At last night’s Council meeting, we tackled the issue of what the appropriate EDU assessment is for Mayor Nelson’s business, Creekside Lounge/Peregrine Steak House.  An extremely abbreviated background on the issue is as follows: Greg Nelson built Creekside during a time when there was a moratorium on new sewer connections.  He was able to build because he demolished two existing residences, built Creekside on that land, and used the EDUs that had previously been assigned to the residences.  It appears that Mr. Nelson should have been assessed additional EDUs at that time, but this did not occur (likely because of the moratorium, but that’s not clear).  In any case, this issue did not come to light until almost a year ago when a routine audit of City records took place.  (You can visit the Kuna Melba News to learn more.)

City Council was asked to determine the appropriate EDU assessment.  We considered the existing EDU assessment table that’s used by City staff in determining how many EDUs to charge proposed commercial construction – it gives various formulas for calculating EDUs for different types of businesses, such as restaurants, laundromats, doctors’ offices, etc.  According to this chart, it was possible to arrive at an EDU assessment of 12 for Creekside as a whole, using the “bar” formula for the Creekside Lounge and the “restaurant” formula for Peregrine Steak House.  However, Kuna City Code also provides for a review mechanism to determine whether the correct number of EDUs were initially assessed: after a year of water/sewer use, a business shall be reassessed using water volume and waste strength as a measure.  By looking at only Creekside’s water volume, it was noted 3.77 EDUs would be appropriate; calculations were not made for the waste strength, but we were advised that if anything, it would cause the assessment to go higher.

Therefore, Council decided to assess Creekside 4 EDUs moving forward.  We determined this was a fair charge by using the reassessment process provided in City Code.  We looked at Creekside as any other business, and the Mayor would agree he did not receive any special treatment.  (It should be noted he excused himself from Council chambers while deliberations occurred and a decision was made.)  No fees were assessed retroactively, as is standard City policy.

The Council also determined that it would be a good idea to re-work the existing EDU chart – there is clearly a problem when the chart says a business should be charged 12 EDUs but an analysis of actual water/sewer use results in an assessment of 4 EDUs.